Medial Partial Knee Replacement
Resurfacing only the inner compartment of the knee: who it fits, what it preserves, and what it does not address.

The short answer
The inner compartment is where knee arthritis most often starts, and it is the compartment partial knee replacement most often treats. A medial partial replacement resurfaces that side alone and leaves the rest of the knee, including the ligaments, in place.
How partial knee replacement works
This one-minute patient-education animation from Stryker shows how a partial knee replacement resurfaces only the worn compartment while the healthy parts of the joint stay. It is a general illustration, not a recording of any specific operation; the safety information at the end is Stryker’s.
Why the inner side wears first
Standing and walking load the inner compartment more than the outer one, so that is where wear commonly begins. Patients often describe pain along the inside of the knee, worse on stairs or after standing, and a leg that has begun to bow slightly.
When imaging and examination agree that the damage is confined to that compartment, resurfacing it alone becomes a reasonable option to discuss.
What is kept, and what that means
A medial partial replacement leaves the outer compartment, the kneecap compartment, and the cruciate ligaments alone. Those ligaments carry much of the knee’s sense of position, and keeping them is the reason the operation behaves the way it does.
The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lists the advantages over a total replacement directly: quicker recovery, less pain afterward, less blood loss, and a lower risk of infection and blood clots. Because the healthy bone, cartilage and ligaments stay, many patients report the knee feels more natural, and range of motion may be better.
In the TOPKAT randomised trial, 528 patients with arthritis confined to this compartment were assigned to a partial or a total replacement. At five years the two groups scored the same, with a similar rate of re-operations, and the authors recommended partial replacement as the first choice for this pattern of arthritis.
What would point to a total knee instead
Arthritis in more than one compartment, an unstable or absent anterior cruciate ligament, a leg that has bowed substantially and no longer corrects, significant stiffness, or inflammatory arthritis such as rheumatoid disease all point away from a partial.
A total knee replacement addresses the whole joint at once, and when wear is already spreading that is the right operation. The question is which one fits your knee, not which one is the bigger commitment.
What to try before either operation
Surgery is not the first step. Targeted strengthening and physical therapy, activity adjustment, weight management where it applies, anti-inflammatory medication where it is safe for you, and selected injections all remain real options, and they still help some people with arthritis limited to one compartment.
Choosing to wait, with a plan, is a reasonable decision. The consultation exists to tell you where you stand, not to schedule an operation.
The risks, and what a later operation involves
Partial knee replacement carries the risks any joint replacement does: infection, blood clots, stiffness, and loosening or wear that needs another operation later. It also carries one risk a total knee does not: arthritis can progress in the compartments that were left alone.
If that happens, the partial can usually be converted to a total knee replacement. That is a second operation with its own recovery, and it belongs in the decision at the start rather than as a surprise later.
Use the consultation to make the decision clearer.
- Does my imaging show arthritis truly limited to the inner compartment?
- Is my anterior cruciate ligament intact?
- How much has my leg bowed, and does it still correct?
- What would converting to a total knee involve if arthritis spreads?
- What would make you recommend a total knee for me instead?
Sources and further reading
- Unicompartmental (Partial) Knee ReplacementAmerican Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
- Total Versus Partial Joint ReplacementAmerican Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
- The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet (Beard et al., 2019)
- Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 41,986 cases from the National Joint Registry for England and WalesThe Bone & Joint Journal (Liddle et al., 2015)
- Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (textbook chapter co-authored by Dr. Patel)Essentials of Cemented Knee Arthroplasty, Springer, 2022